Ministers of the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries and allied nations (OPEC+) are expected to keep current output levels unchanged when they meet for online meetings on Sunday, analysts told AFP.
The biannual ministerial meeting comes as uncertainty remains over how oil prices will develop in the near future, with traders looking for signs that indicate progress in ongoing negotiations on resolving the conflict in Ukraine, which could lead to the return of Russian crude to markets.
Since April, eight key OPEC+ members led by Saudi Arabia and Russia have boosted production in an effort to regain market share amid strong competition from producers outside the group such as the United States, Canada and Guyana.
But in early November, the V8 group announced they would pause their output increases in the first quarter of 2026 due to expected lower seasonal demand, following a small increase in December.
The OPEC+ ministerial meeting is thus "unlikely to deliver any major new drivers for the market", said Commerzbank analyst Barbara Lambrecht.
"A ceasefire would likely stop mutual attacks on energy infrastructure, and sanctions might be eased or even lifted," which would reduce the risk premium that is currently driving up oil prices, she said.
A deadlock in negotiations, however, "could force (US President Donald) Trump to tighten sanctions again" against Russia's oil industry, likely pushing oil prices higher, said Arne Lohmann Rasmussen, an analyst at Global Risk Management.
Uncertainty around the future of oil prices has reinforced analysts' belief that OPEC+ will maintain group-wide current output levels as earlier predicted by the group of eight.
At its previous ministerial meeting, the group said it plans to assess the maximum sustainable production capacity for each member country, which will serve as a benchmark for quotas from 2027 onwards.
"There's some noise around how there could be some discussions around baseline production levels," said Kim Fustier, an analyst at HSBC.
However, Fustier believed it was "still too soon for them to be discussing it" and that the group would wait until 2026.
Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd,
racist or sexually-oriented language. PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK. Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another
person will not be tolerated. Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone
or anything. Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism
that is degrading to another person. Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on
each comment to let us know of abusive posts. Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness
accounts, the history behind an article.
(0) comments
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.